Category Archives: Main

AE911Truth shines 3rd Beam into NYC skyline for WTC 7

NEW YORK CITY, Sept. 11 – At 9:11 p.m. on the 9th anniversary of the September attacks, the members of the 1280 strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth lit up the skies over Manhattan with a towering 2 billion-candlepower beam of light to raise public awareness that three, not just two, World Trade Center high-rise buildings collapsed symmetrically at near free-fall acceleration on 9/11, though only two were hit by planes. ‘Why is there a Third Beam in my skyline?’ New Yorkers are asking tonight. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA, who held a press conference earlier in the day at the now-rebuilt WTC 7 with victims family members, states “The people of New York need to see the light – that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on Sept. 11. They have been deceived to about what happened on that terrible day. We are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a

truly independent new investigation is needed both as a
matter of national security and as the key to justice for the victims of the Twin Towers.” At the press conference, AE911truth was joined by 9/11 victims family members from the organization NYC CAN (New York Coalition for Accountability now). Gage was in NYC speaking at a major
live-streamed symposium on “How the World Changed After 9/11”. This event at INN World Report is taking place at 56 Walker Street, Lower Manhattan, withnational and international leaders of the 9/11 Truth and accountability movement. “Building 7 is a ‘Smoking Gun of the 9/11 crime scene” Gage said. “We hope that after tonight, New Yorkers will see September 11th in a whole new light.”
The third beam went on at 9:11pm without a hitch! 200 people in the street with signs marveling at the 3rd beam from the perspective from the conference – where all three beams were shown in alignment. It was awesome team! We had our folks calling the media saying “what is that third beam in the sky?” It was up for 2 hours. Then the big twin tower beams went off! So we packed up ours because it didn’t make sense to have just one beam in the sky. Then – theirs went back on again! Oh well. We had a helicopter circle by but no real issues of police action, and no media showing up despite the press release and earlier suggestions at the NYC press conference. We hope the media will be covering the event on Monday.
For coverage from our supporters see: 
Huge thanks to the inspiration, dedication, logistical support, and financing – all from the wonderful Barbara Honnegar! Please support Barbara and AE911Truth with a donation to help us cover the costs for this vital awareness campaign for Building 7. See attached 3-min interview text that we recorded on video and fed to the media. See attached press release too. The excitement here at the Ny conference it electric over this third beam!
Richard Gage, AIA
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

Madeleine Albright – 60 Minutes

On May 12, 1996, Madeleine Albright (then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations) appeared on a 60 Minutes segment in which she “came across as cold-blooded and cruel.”[26] Lesley Stahl asked her “We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?” and Albright replied “we think the price is worth it.” Albright later criticized Stahl’s segment as “amount[ing] to Iraqi propaganda,” – Wikipedia source links [27][28][29]

A montage of the Bush Administrations Lies and cover up

Briton ‘among thousands held without trial in Iraq’

A British man is among tens of thousands of people imprisoned without charge in Iraq, according to an Amnesty International report.  The human rights group said 30,000 detainees were being held without trial in Iraq, and criticised the Iraqis and the US for violating prisoners’ rights.  Ramze Shihab Ahmed, 68, a dual UK-Iraqi national, has been detained in Iraq since December 2009.  His wife claims he has been tortured in prisons in Baghdad.
Rabiha al-Qassab said her husband had suffered electric shocks to his genitals and suffocation by plastic bag, and called on the government to increase its efforts to secure his release or push for a fair trial.

“What my husband has suffered at the hands of his interrogators is inhumane and sickening.  “I’m desperately worried about him. He already had health problems before all this,” she said.  “I’d like to see the UK government stepping up efforts to get Ramzi released or at least given a fair trial if there’s anything that could reasonably be held against him.  “The Iraqi authorities should either try or release him – not go through this disgusting charade of torture and false confessions.” Mr Ahmed was arrested after travelling to Iraq in an attempt to free his detained son Omar.  His whereabouts were unknown until March when he was able to make a short phone call to his wife in London.  Amnesty said the use of torture to extract confessions in Iraq was routine – and the confessions were frequently used as evidence in court.  The group also claimed several detainees had died while in prison, apparently as the result of torture or ill-treatment.

Malcolm Smart, Amnesty International’s Middle East and north Africa director, said the Iraqi authorities had “signally failed to take effective action to stop torture and punish the perpetrators, despite overwhelming evidence to its use”.  “They have a duty to investigate, to hold perpetrators accountable and bring them to justice, and to provide reparations to the victims.  “The Iraqi authorities’ failure to take such concrete steps sends a message that such violations are tolerated and can be repeated,” he said. Amnesty is appealing to Foreign Secretary William Hague asking him to increase pressure upon the Iraqi authorities to intervene in Mr Ahmed’s case. The Foreign Office said they were granted access to Mr Ahmed in April. He is now being visited regularly.  A Foreign Office spokesman said: “We are very concerned by Mr Ahmed’s allegations of mistreatment, and raised them with the Iraqi authorities at a senior level as soon as we were aware of them.  “We have repeatedly made clear to the Iraqi authorities how seriously we take such allegations, and have requested that they be investigated.

“We expect the Iraqi government to follow through on its commitment to investigate these allegations.”  Amnesty said that couple escaped from Iraq several years ago. Mr Ahmed was part of a failed 1992 plot to oust Saddam Hussain.  About 10,000 of the 30,000 detainees being held without trial in Iraq had been recently transferred from US custody, following the end of US combat operations in the country. The US handed over control of the last remaining military-run detention facility to the Iraqi authorities in July.  Amnesty said it did so without proper assurances that prisoners’ rights would be respected.

Italian student tells of arrest while filming for fun

Police community support officers (PCSOs) stopped Italian student Simona Bonomo under anti-terrorism legislation for filming buildings in London. Moments later, she was arrested by other officers, held in a police cell and fined. She talks Paul Lewis through the footage she recorded of her conversation with the PSCOs. An Italian student has described how she was stopped by police under anti-terrorist legislation while filming buildings, and later arrested, held in a police cell for five hours and given a fixed penalty notice. Simona Bonomo, 32, an art student at London Metropolitan University at London Metropolitan University, filmed the moment on 19 November when she was approached by two police community support officers (PCSOs) in Paddington, west London. When Bonomo was challenged by one PCSO, she said she was filming “just for fun”. He replied: “You like looking at those buildings do you? You’re basically filming for fun? I don’t believe you.”
Bonomo then declined his request to see what she had filmed. “I can have a look if I want to, if I think it may be linked to terrorism. This is an iconic site,” he replied. Bonomo then said she was an artist. “You’re an artist? Have you got any proof or any identification?” he said. After accusing Bonomo of being cocky, the PCSO said she had been cycling the wrong way down a one-way street and threatened to fine her. After she apologised, the PCSOs departed, but returned moments later with about six police officers, she said. She was searched and, after an altercation with one officer, was accused of being aggressive, bundled to the ground and arrested. The PCSOs were not involved in the arrest. After five hours in a police cell, Bonomo said she was told to sign an £80 fixed penalty fine for a public order offence. She plans to contest the penalty, which stipulated she caused “harassment, alarm and distress” in public. Bonomo returned the next day to interview builders who had witnessed her arrest. Footage of the interviews appears to corroborate her account. “I was disgusted,” one said. “They were terribly out of order. There was one officer who was spiteful to you.”
The Met confirmed that a woman was stopped and searched under section 44 of the Terrorism Act. Any complaint made to police would be fully investigated.

Specter: Pentagon may be obstructing committee – Able Danger

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Department of Defense “ordered five key witnesses not to testify” about a secret Pentagon unit that some claim identified several of the 9/11 hijackers more than a year before the attacks, Sentate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter said Wednesday.

“That looks to me as it may be obstruction of the committee’s activities,” Specter, R-Pennsylvania, said at the start of his committee’s hearing into the unit code-named Able Danger.
Before Wednesday’s hearing, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Pentagon was concerned about discussing a classified program in an open hearing and it had worked with the committee to provide a Department of Defense representative to testify. That representative was the acting assistant to the secretary for intelligence oversight, William Dugan.
Whitman also said the Pentagon is “working very closely with the committees of oversight to provide them with all of the info they need to assess Able Danger.” The Judiciary Committee does not have oversight over the Pentagon.
At Wednesday’s hearings, attorney Mark Zaid testified that his clients, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and defense contractor James Smith, had been prevented from testifying. Shaffer and Smith contend that Able Danger used data mining techniques to identify four of the September 11 hijackers, including Mohammed Atta, and that at least one chart existed that featured a photograph of Atta.  Shaffer and Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pennsylvania, have previously made these assertions in media reports and other public forums.
Zaid also testified that “at no time did Able Danger identify Mohammed Atta as being physically present in the United States.” And, he said, “No information obtained at the time would have led anyone to believe criminal activity had taken place or that any specific terrorist activities were being planned.”
Also testifying Wednesday was a former defense intelligence analyst, Erik Kleinsmith, who said he helped support Able Danger in 1999 and 2000. He testified that in April 2000 his work became “severely restricted and ultimately shut down due to intelligence oversight concerns,” which led to the destruction of very large amounts of data about Able Danger, including information about Atta and other terrorists.

Dispute over ‘classified’ material delays Afghan war memoir by ex-Army intelligence officer

Published September 09, 2010
| Associated Press

WASHINGTON –  A former Army intelligence officer’s attorney is questioning whether a new Defense Department security review of his client’s memoir on the Afghanistan war is a retaliatory move that has forced a delay in the book’s publication. Anthony A. Shaffer’s book “Operation Dark Heart: Spycraft and Special Ops on the Frontlines ofAfghanistan — and the Path to Victory” was to be released by St. Martin’s Press on Aug. 31. Shaffer’s lawyer, Mark Zaid, says the Army Reserve cleared the manuscript for publication before it went to press. However, Zaid says the Defense Department rescinded the approval shortly before publication, claiming the text contained classified information. About 9,000 copies of the book now sit in a warehouse. A cleared version is back on press with sections blacked out by defense officials. Its publication date is unclear.

The New York Times reported on its website Thursday night that the Pentagon is seeking to buy and destroy all copies of the book’s first printing. The newspaper had obtained a copy of the book, which it described as “a breezily written, first-person account of Colonel Shaffer’s five months in Afghanistan in 2003.” Shaffer was a civilian Defense Intelligence Agency officer based near Kabul, the paper reported. But he ran afoul of the DIA in 2003 when he claimed that one of his assignments uncovered that Mohammed Atta was a potential terrorist threat before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Atta was the lead hijacker of one of the planes that crashed into New York’s World Trade Center. Shaffer’s relationship with DIA worsened, until he was stripped of his security clearance and then fired, Zaid said. Still, the Army Reserves promoted him from major to lieutenant colonel, and he was awarded the Bronze Star for his work in Afghanistan. “Tony Shaffer has been a thorn in the DIA’s side for years. Anything that Tony said or did was of concern to the DIA,” Zaid said.
In 2005, the DIA censured Shaffer and prohibited him from testifying before Congress on an operation code named Able Danger, which Shaffer maintains uncovered Atta as a potential threat. Zaid had to testify in his place, he said.
Revoking approval to publish the book at the last minute raises questions, Zaid says, because the DIA knew for months the book was coming out.
“Either someone woke up and smelled the roses or it was retaliatory,” he said.
But Defense Department officials maintain that Shaffer didn’t follow appropriate review procedures before the book went to press, and the Defense Department only found out after the manuscript was printed.
“That manuscript did not undergo a prepublication information security review as required by DoD regulation,” said Col. Dave Lapin, a Pentagon spokesman. Zaid says “there was an apparent disconnect” as to who possessed the authority to clear the book. Zaid and Lapin say both sides have worked closely and cooperatively with the publisher on a redacted version of the book.

Israel rabbi calls for ‘plague’ on Mahmoud Abbas

A senior rabbi from a party within Israel’s coalition government has called for Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas to “vanish from our world”. Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, spiritual leader of Shas, spoke out as Middle East talks are poised to begin in Washington. The United States condemned the remarks as “deeply offensive”. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu distanced himself from the comments with a statement saying that his government wanted peace with the Palestinians. The attack on Mr Abbas, delivered in the rabbi’s weekly sermon, also prompted chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat to condemn the remarks as “an incitement to genocide”. Mr Erakat urged the Israeli government “to do more about peace and stop spreading hatred”, the AFP news agency reported.

Rabbi Yosef expressed the wish that “all the nasty people who hate Israel, like Abu Mazen (Abbas), vanish from our world”.  He went on to say: “May God strike them down with the plague along with all the nasty Palestinians who persecute Israel.” The remarks come as Mr Netanyahu is due in Washington this week for direct peace talks with Mr Abbas. US President Barack Obama hopes to bring the leaders together on Thursday for the first face-to-face discussions since December 2008, when the Palestinians broke off negotiations over Israel’s offensive against the Gaza Strip. The US response to Rabbi Yosef, a founder of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, was swift. In a statement, US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley said: “We regret and condemn the inflammatory statements by Rabbi Ovadia Yosef.

Mr Netanyahu’s office issued a statement saying that Rabbi Yosef’s comments “do not reflect the views of Benjamin Netanyahu or of his government”. The 89-year-old former chief rabbi of Israel has been at the centre of controversy before, with comments about Arabs, secular Jews, liberals, women and gays. In 2001, during a Palestinian uprising, he called for the annihilation of Arabs and said it was forbidden to be merciful to them. He later said he was referring only to “terrorists” who attacked Israelis.

Meanwhile, Mr Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, said on Sunday that Israel’s policy of settlement-building could undermine the new round of peace talks. “Israel will be held accountable for the failure of the talks if settlement construction should continue,” Mr Abbas said in a speech delivered in Jordan. “The negotiations need to bring about serious action that will be able to bring liberation from the occupation and independence. ” Mr Abbas said Palestinians understood Israel’s need for security, but said that need should not be an “excuse to expand settlements and steal land”. In the statement responding to Rabbi Yosef’s remarks, Mr Netanyahu’s office said Israel intended to negotiate in good faith in Washington.

“Israel plans to take part in peace negotiations out of a desire to advance toward a peace agreement with the Palestinians that will end the conflict and ensure peace, security and good neighbourly relations between the two peoples,” the statement said.

Analysts say expectations for the latest round of talks are low, with the settlement issue just one of a number of area of difference.

When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing

By William M. Arkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Monday, Feb. 1, 1999

“Gentlemen! We have called you together to inform you that we are going to overthrow the United States government.” So begins a statement being delivered by Gen. Carl W. Steiner, former Commander-in-chief, U.S. Special Operations Command.

At least the voice sounds amazingly like him.

But it is not Steiner. It is the result of voice “morphing” technology developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

By taking just a 10-minute digital recording of Steiner’s voice, scientist George Papcun is able, in near real time, to clone speech patterns and develop an accurate facsimile. Steiner was so impressed, he asked for a copy of the tape.

Steiner was hardly the first or last victim to be spoofed by Papcun’s team members. To refine their method, they took various high quality recordings of generals and experimented with creating fake statements. One of the most memorable is Colin Powell stating

“I am being treated well by my captors.”

“They chose to have him say something he would never otherwise have said,” chuckled one of Papcun’s colleagues.

A Box of Chocolates is Like War
——————————————————————————–

Most Americans were introduced to the tricks of the digital age in the movie Forrest Gump, when the character played by Tom Hanks appeared to shake hands with President Kennedy.

For Hollywood, it is special effects. For covert operators in the U.S. military and intelligence agencies, it is a weapon of the future.

“Once you can take any kind of information and reduce it into ones and zeros, you can do some pretty interesting things,” says Daniel T. Kuehl, chairman of the Information Operations department of the National Defense University in Washington, the military’s school for information warfare.

Digital morphing — voice, video, and photo — has come of age, available for use in psychological operations. PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to pursue national and battlefield objectives.

To some, PSYOPS is a backwater military discipline of leaflet dropping and radio propaganda. To a growing group of information war technologists, it is the nexus of fantasy and reality. Being able to manufacture convincing audio or video, they say, might be the difference in a successful military operation or coup.

Allah on the Holodeck
——————————————————————————–

Pentagon planners started to discuss digital morphing after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Covert operators kicked around the idea of creating a computer-faked videotape of Saddam Hussein crying or showing other such manly weaknesses, or in some sexually compromising situation. The nascent plan was for the tapes to be flooded into Iraq and the Arab world.

The tape war never proceeded, killed, participants say, by bureaucratic fights over jurisdiction, skepticism over the technology, and concerns raised by Arab coalition partners.

But the “strategic” PSYOPS scheming didn’t die. What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad urging the Iraqi people and Army to rise up against Saddam, a senior Air Force officer asked in 1990?

According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air.

But doing so over the skies of Iraq? To project such a hologram over Baghdad on the order of several hundred feet, they calculated, would take a mirror more than a mile square in space, as well as huge projectors and power sources.

And besides, investigators came back, what does Allah look like?

The Gulf War hologram story might be dismissed were it not the case that washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The “Holographic Projector” is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to “project information power from space … for special operations deception missions.”

War is Like a Box of Chocolates
——————————————————————————–

Voice-morphing? Fake video? Holographic projection? They sound more like Mission Impossible and Star Trek gimmicks than weapons. Yet for each, there are corresponding and growing research efforts as the technologies improve and offensive information warfare expands.

Whereas early voice morphing required cutting and pasting speech to put letters or words together to make a composite, Papcun’s software developed at Los Alamos can far more accurately replicate the way one actually speaks. Eliminated are the robotic intonations.

The irony is that after Papcun finished his speech cloning research, there were no takers in the military. Luckily for him, Hollywood is interested: The promise of creating a virtual Clark Gable is mightier than the sword.

Video and photo manipulation has already raised profound questions of authenticity for the journalistic world. With audio joining the mix, it is not only journalists but also privacy advocates and the conspiracy-minded who will no doubt ponder the worrisome mischief that lurks in the not too distant future.

“We already know that seeing isn’t necessarily believing,” says Dan Kuehl, “now I guess hearing isn’t either.”

——————————————————————————–

William M. Arkin, author of “The U.S. Military Online,” is a leading expert on national security and the Internet. He lectures and writes on nuclear weapons, military matters and information warfare. An Army intelligence analyst from 1974-1978, Arkin currently consults for Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, MSNBC and the Natural Resources Defense Council.
 
Links:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm

Demos fears government terror strategy ‘fuels mistrust’

“The report – entitled the Power of Unreason – says groups use conspiracy theories to recruit and radicalise people to commit acts of violence.  An example of one such theory is that the bombings in New York and London, on 11 September 2001 and 7 July 2005 respectively, were “inside jobs” carried out by authorities in the US and UK.” – BBC NEWS

Building what?