Michael Moore Responds To President Obama’s Afghanistan Speech

Letter to President Obama

Dear President Obama,
Do you really want to be the new “war president”? If you go to West Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you are the new war president. Pure and simple. And with that you will do the worst possible thing you could do — destroy the hopes and dreams so many millions have placed in you. With just one speech tomorrow night you will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your campaign into disillusioned cynics. You will teach them what they’ve always heard is true — that all politicians are alike. I simply can’t believe you’re about to do what they say you are going to do. Please say it isn’t so. It is not your job to do what the generals tell you to do. We are a civilian-run government. WE tell the Joint Chiefs what to do, not the other way around. That’s the way General Washington insisted it must be. That’s what President Truman told General MacArthur when MacArthur wanted to invade China. “You’re fired!,” said Truman, and that was that. And you should have fired Gen. McChrystal when he went to the press to preempt you, telling the press what YOU had to do. Let me be blunt: We love our kids in the armed services, but we f*#&in’ hate these generals, from Westmoreland in Vietnam to, yes, even Colin Powell for lying to the UN with his made-up drawings of WMD (he has since sought redemption).
So now you feel backed into a corner. 30 years ago this past Thursday (Thanksgiving) the Soviet generals had a cool idea — “Let’s invade Afghanistan!” Well, that turned out to be the final nail in the USSR coffin.
There’s a reason they don’t call Afghanistan the “Garden State” (though they probably should, seeing how the corrupt President Karzai, whom we back, has his brother in the heroin trade raising poppies). Afghanistan’s nickname is the “Graveyard of Empires.” If you don’t believe it, give the British a call. I’d have you call Genghis Khan but I lost his number. I do have Gorbachev’s number though. It’s + 41 22 789 1662. I’m sure he could give you an earful about the historic blunder you’re about to commit. With our economic collapse still in full swing and our precious young men and women being sacrificed on the altar of arrogance and greed, the breakdown of this great civilization we call America will head, full throttle, into oblivion if you become the “war president.” Empires never think the end is near, until the end is here. Empires think that more evil will force the heathens to toe the line — and yet it never works. The heathens usually tear them to shreds.
Choose carefully, President Obama. You of all people know that it doesn’t have to be this way. You still have a few hours to listen to your heart, and your own clear thinking. You know that nothing good can come from sending more troops halfway around the world to a place neither you nor they understand, to achieve an objective that neither you nor they understand, in a country that does not want us there. You can feel it in your bones. I know you know that there are LESS than a hundred al-Qaeda left in Afghanistan! A hundred thousand troops trying to crush a hundred guys living in caves? Are you serious? Have you drunk Bush’s Kool-Aid? I refuse to believe it. Your potential decision to expand the war (while saying that you’re doing it so you can “end the war”) will do more to set your legacy in stone than any of the great things you’ve said and done in your first year. One more throwing a bone from you to the Republicans and the coalition of the hopeful and the hopeless may be gone — and this nation will be back in the hands of the haters quicker than you can shout “tea bag!”
Choose carefully, Mr. President. Your corporate backers are going to abandon you as soon as it is clear you are a one-term president and that the nation will be safely back in the hands of the usual idiots who do their bidding. That could be Wednesday morning. We the people still love you. We the people still have a sliver of hope. But we the people can’t take it anymore. We can’t take your caving in, over and over, when we elected you by a big, wide margin of millions to get in there and get the job done. What part of “landslide victory” don’t you understand? Don’t be deceived into thinking that sending a few more troops into Afghanistan will make a difference, or earn you the respect of the haters. They will not stop until this country is torn asunder and every last dollar is extracted from the poor and soon-to-be poor. You could send a million troops over there and the crazy Right still wouldn’t be happy. You would still be the victim of their incessant venom on hate radio and television because no matter what you do, you can’t change the one thing about yourself that sends them over the edge.The haters were not the ones who elected you, and they can’t be won over by abandoning the rest of us.
President Obama, it’s time to come home. Ask your neighbors in Chicago and the parents of the young men and women doing the fighting and dying if they want more billions and more troops sent to Afghanistan. Do you think they will say, “No, we don’t need health care, we don’t need jobs, we don’t need homes. You go on ahead, Mr. President, and send our wealth and our sons and daughters overseas, ’cause we don’t need them, either.”
What would Martin Luther King, Jr. do? What would your grandmother do? Not send more poor people to kill other poor people who pose no threat to them, that’s what they’d do. Not spend billions and trillions to wage war while American children are sleeping on the streets and standing in bread lines.
All of us that voted and prayed for you and cried the night of your victory have endured an Orwellian hell of eight years of crimes committed in our name: torture, rendition, suspension of the bill of rights, invading nations who had not attacked us, blowing up neighborhoods that Saddam “might” be in (but never was), slaughtering wedding parties in Afghanistan. We watched as hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians were slaughtered and tens of thousands of our brave young men and women were killed, maimed, or endured mental anguish — the full terror of which we scarcely know.
When we elected you we didn’t expect miracles. We didn’t even expect much change. But we expected some. We thought you would stop the madness. Stop the killing. Stop the insane idea that men with guns can reorganize a nation that doesn’t even function as a nation and never, ever has.
Stop, stop, stop! For the sake of the lives of young Americans and Afghan civilians, stop. For the sake of your presidency, hope, and the future of our nation, stop. For God’s sake, stop. Tonight we still have hope. Tomorrow, we shall see. The ball is in your court. You DON’T have to do this. You can be a profile in courage. You can be your mother’s son.
We’re counting on you.
Yours,

9/11 Blueprint for Truth presented by Architect Richard Gage, AIA

9/11 Blueprint for Truth: The Architecture of Destruction Commercial architect Richard Gage (founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) presents a watertight case for controlled demolition of the three steel-building collapses at the World Trade Center, New York on 9/11/01.

Includes physicist Steven Jones’ updated evidence of thermite. Gage’s website, http://www.ae911truth.org, is rapidly drawing building and engineering professionals to the 9/11 movement. —

Part I – WTC Building #7 1 Symmetrical Collapse 2 Explosions 3 Fire 4 FEMA Report 5 Free Fall 6 Expert Corroboration 7 Squib Explosions 8 Molten Metal 9 Foreknowledge 10 Bldg 7 Conclusions

Part II – WTC Twin Towers 1 WTC History 2 Twin Towers’ Structure 3 FEMA Deception 4 Explosions 5 Columns Cut 6 Rapid Onset 7 Demolition Waves 8 Free Fall Speed 9 Explosive Squibs 10 Symmetrical Collapse 11 Skeleton Broken Up 12 Molten Iron 13 Dust Clouds 14 Destruction by Fire 15 NIST Deceptions 16 Foreknowledge 17 Expert Corroboration 18 Conclusion — Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Website :

http://www.ae911truth.org/ — Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice Website: http://www.stj911.org/ — Pilots For 9/11 Truth Website: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ — General 9/11 Links, News and Events – http://www.911blogger.com/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.truthaction.org/

Remaining Stages of Identity Documents Bill (To Abolish)

Minister for Immigration, Damian Green, introduced the report stage and third reading of the Identity Documents Bill in the Commons. The Bill passed its remaining stages.

Report stage

The report stage gives MPs an opportunity, on the floor of the House, to consider further amendments (proposals for change) to a Bill which has been examined in committee.
There is no set time period between the end of committee stage and the start of the report stage.

What happens at report stage?

All MPs may speak and vote – for lengthy or complex Bills the debates may be spread over several days.
All MPs can suggest amendments to the Bill or new clauses (parts) they think should be added.

What happens after report stage?

Report stage is usually followed immediately by debate on the Bill’s third reading.

AE911Truth shines 3rd Beam into NYC skyline for WTC 7

NEW YORK CITY, Sept. 11 – At 9:11 p.m. on the 9th anniversary of the September attacks, the members of the 1280 strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth lit up the skies over Manhattan with a towering 2 billion-candlepower beam of light to raise public awareness that three, not just two, World Trade Center high-rise buildings collapsed symmetrically at near free-fall acceleration on 9/11, though only two were hit by planes. ‘Why is there a Third Beam in my skyline?’ New Yorkers are asking tonight. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA, who held a press conference earlier in the day at the now-rebuilt WTC 7 with victims family members, states “The people of New York need to see the light – that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on Sept. 11. They have been deceived to about what happened on that terrible day. We are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a

truly independent new investigation is needed both as a
matter of national security and as the key to justice for the victims of the Twin Towers.” At the press conference, AE911truth was joined by 9/11 victims family members from the organization NYC CAN (New York Coalition for Accountability now). Gage was in NYC speaking at a major
live-streamed symposium on “How the World Changed After 9/11”. This event at INN World Report is taking place at 56 Walker Street, Lower Manhattan, withnational and international leaders of the 9/11 Truth and accountability movement. “Building 7 is a ‘Smoking Gun of the 9/11 crime scene” Gage said. “We hope that after tonight, New Yorkers will see September 11th in a whole new light.”
The third beam went on at 9:11pm without a hitch! 200 people in the street with signs marveling at the 3rd beam from the perspective from the conference – where all three beams were shown in alignment. It was awesome team! We had our folks calling the media saying “what is that third beam in the sky?” It was up for 2 hours. Then the big twin tower beams went off! So we packed up ours because it didn’t make sense to have just one beam in the sky. Then – theirs went back on again! Oh well. We had a helicopter circle by but no real issues of police action, and no media showing up despite the press release and earlier suggestions at the NYC press conference. We hope the media will be covering the event on Monday.
For coverage from our supporters see: 
Huge thanks to the inspiration, dedication, logistical support, and financing – all from the wonderful Barbara Honnegar! Please support Barbara and AE911Truth with a donation to help us cover the costs for this vital awareness campaign for Building 7. See attached 3-min interview text that we recorded on video and fed to the media. See attached press release too. The excitement here at the Ny conference it electric over this third beam!
Richard Gage, AIA
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

Madeleine Albright – 60 Minutes

On May 12, 1996, Madeleine Albright (then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations) appeared on a 60 Minutes segment in which she “came across as cold-blooded and cruel.”[26] Lesley Stahl asked her “We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?” and Albright replied “we think the price is worth it.” Albright later criticized Stahl’s segment as “amount[ing] to Iraqi propaganda,” – Wikipedia source links [27][28][29]

A montage of the Bush Administrations Lies and cover up

Briton ‘among thousands held without trial in Iraq’

A British man is among tens of thousands of people imprisoned without charge in Iraq, according to an Amnesty International report.  The human rights group said 30,000 detainees were being held without trial in Iraq, and criticised the Iraqis and the US for violating prisoners’ rights.  Ramze Shihab Ahmed, 68, a dual UK-Iraqi national, has been detained in Iraq since December 2009.  His wife claims he has been tortured in prisons in Baghdad.
Rabiha al-Qassab said her husband had suffered electric shocks to his genitals and suffocation by plastic bag, and called on the government to increase its efforts to secure his release or push for a fair trial.

“What my husband has suffered at the hands of his interrogators is inhumane and sickening.  “I’m desperately worried about him. He already had health problems before all this,” she said.  “I’d like to see the UK government stepping up efforts to get Ramzi released or at least given a fair trial if there’s anything that could reasonably be held against him.  “The Iraqi authorities should either try or release him – not go through this disgusting charade of torture and false confessions.” Mr Ahmed was arrested after travelling to Iraq in an attempt to free his detained son Omar.  His whereabouts were unknown until March when he was able to make a short phone call to his wife in London.  Amnesty said the use of torture to extract confessions in Iraq was routine – and the confessions were frequently used as evidence in court.  The group also claimed several detainees had died while in prison, apparently as the result of torture or ill-treatment.

Malcolm Smart, Amnesty International’s Middle East and north Africa director, said the Iraqi authorities had “signally failed to take effective action to stop torture and punish the perpetrators, despite overwhelming evidence to its use”.  “They have a duty to investigate, to hold perpetrators accountable and bring them to justice, and to provide reparations to the victims.  “The Iraqi authorities’ failure to take such concrete steps sends a message that such violations are tolerated and can be repeated,” he said. Amnesty is appealing to Foreign Secretary William Hague asking him to increase pressure upon the Iraqi authorities to intervene in Mr Ahmed’s case. The Foreign Office said they were granted access to Mr Ahmed in April. He is now being visited regularly.  A Foreign Office spokesman said: “We are very concerned by Mr Ahmed’s allegations of mistreatment, and raised them with the Iraqi authorities at a senior level as soon as we were aware of them.  “We have repeatedly made clear to the Iraqi authorities how seriously we take such allegations, and have requested that they be investigated.

“We expect the Iraqi government to follow through on its commitment to investigate these allegations.”  Amnesty said that couple escaped from Iraq several years ago. Mr Ahmed was part of a failed 1992 plot to oust Saddam Hussain.  About 10,000 of the 30,000 detainees being held without trial in Iraq had been recently transferred from US custody, following the end of US combat operations in the country. The US handed over control of the last remaining military-run detention facility to the Iraqi authorities in July.  Amnesty said it did so without proper assurances that prisoners’ rights would be respected.

Italian student tells of arrest while filming for fun

Police community support officers (PCSOs) stopped Italian student Simona Bonomo under anti-terrorism legislation for filming buildings in London. Moments later, she was arrested by other officers, held in a police cell and fined. She talks Paul Lewis through the footage she recorded of her conversation with the PSCOs. An Italian student has described how she was stopped by police under anti-terrorist legislation while filming buildings, and later arrested, held in a police cell for five hours and given a fixed penalty notice. Simona Bonomo, 32, an art student at London Metropolitan University at London Metropolitan University, filmed the moment on 19 November when she was approached by two police community support officers (PCSOs) in Paddington, west London. When Bonomo was challenged by one PCSO, she said she was filming “just for fun”. He replied: “You like looking at those buildings do you? You’re basically filming for fun? I don’t believe you.”
Bonomo then declined his request to see what she had filmed. “I can have a look if I want to, if I think it may be linked to terrorism. This is an iconic site,” he replied. Bonomo then said she was an artist. “You’re an artist? Have you got any proof or any identification?” he said. After accusing Bonomo of being cocky, the PCSO said she had been cycling the wrong way down a one-way street and threatened to fine her. After she apologised, the PCSOs departed, but returned moments later with about six police officers, she said. She was searched and, after an altercation with one officer, was accused of being aggressive, bundled to the ground and arrested. The PCSOs were not involved in the arrest. After five hours in a police cell, Bonomo said she was told to sign an £80 fixed penalty fine for a public order offence. She plans to contest the penalty, which stipulated she caused “harassment, alarm and distress” in public. Bonomo returned the next day to interview builders who had witnessed her arrest. Footage of the interviews appears to corroborate her account. “I was disgusted,” one said. “They were terribly out of order. There was one officer who was spiteful to you.”
The Met confirmed that a woman was stopped and searched under section 44 of the Terrorism Act. Any complaint made to police would be fully investigated.

Specter: Pentagon may be obstructing committee – Able Danger

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Department of Defense “ordered five key witnesses not to testify” about a secret Pentagon unit that some claim identified several of the 9/11 hijackers more than a year before the attacks, Sentate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter said Wednesday.

“That looks to me as it may be obstruction of the committee’s activities,” Specter, R-Pennsylvania, said at the start of his committee’s hearing into the unit code-named Able Danger.
Before Wednesday’s hearing, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Pentagon was concerned about discussing a classified program in an open hearing and it had worked with the committee to provide a Department of Defense representative to testify. That representative was the acting assistant to the secretary for intelligence oversight, William Dugan.
Whitman also said the Pentagon is “working very closely with the committees of oversight to provide them with all of the info they need to assess Able Danger.” The Judiciary Committee does not have oversight over the Pentagon.
At Wednesday’s hearings, attorney Mark Zaid testified that his clients, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and defense contractor James Smith, had been prevented from testifying. Shaffer and Smith contend that Able Danger used data mining techniques to identify four of the September 11 hijackers, including Mohammed Atta, and that at least one chart existed that featured a photograph of Atta.  Shaffer and Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pennsylvania, have previously made these assertions in media reports and other public forums.
Zaid also testified that “at no time did Able Danger identify Mohammed Atta as being physically present in the United States.” And, he said, “No information obtained at the time would have led anyone to believe criminal activity had taken place or that any specific terrorist activities were being planned.”
Also testifying Wednesday was a former defense intelligence analyst, Erik Kleinsmith, who said he helped support Able Danger in 1999 and 2000. He testified that in April 2000 his work became “severely restricted and ultimately shut down due to intelligence oversight concerns,” which led to the destruction of very large amounts of data about Able Danger, including information about Atta and other terrorists.

Dispute over ‘classified’ material delays Afghan war memoir by ex-Army intelligence officer

Published September 09, 2010
| Associated Press

WASHINGTON –  A former Army intelligence officer’s attorney is questioning whether a new Defense Department security review of his client’s memoir on the Afghanistan war is a retaliatory move that has forced a delay in the book’s publication. Anthony A. Shaffer’s book “Operation Dark Heart: Spycraft and Special Ops on the Frontlines ofAfghanistan — and the Path to Victory” was to be released by St. Martin’s Press on Aug. 31. Shaffer’s lawyer, Mark Zaid, says the Army Reserve cleared the manuscript for publication before it went to press. However, Zaid says the Defense Department rescinded the approval shortly before publication, claiming the text contained classified information. About 9,000 copies of the book now sit in a warehouse. A cleared version is back on press with sections blacked out by defense officials. Its publication date is unclear.

The New York Times reported on its website Thursday night that the Pentagon is seeking to buy and destroy all copies of the book’s first printing. The newspaper had obtained a copy of the book, which it described as “a breezily written, first-person account of Colonel Shaffer’s five months in Afghanistan in 2003.” Shaffer was a civilian Defense Intelligence Agency officer based near Kabul, the paper reported. But he ran afoul of the DIA in 2003 when he claimed that one of his assignments uncovered that Mohammed Atta was a potential terrorist threat before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Atta was the lead hijacker of one of the planes that crashed into New York’s World Trade Center. Shaffer’s relationship with DIA worsened, until he was stripped of his security clearance and then fired, Zaid said. Still, the Army Reserves promoted him from major to lieutenant colonel, and he was awarded the Bronze Star for his work in Afghanistan. “Tony Shaffer has been a thorn in the DIA’s side for years. Anything that Tony said or did was of concern to the DIA,” Zaid said.
In 2005, the DIA censured Shaffer and prohibited him from testifying before Congress on an operation code named Able Danger, which Shaffer maintains uncovered Atta as a potential threat. Zaid had to testify in his place, he said.
Revoking approval to publish the book at the last minute raises questions, Zaid says, because the DIA knew for months the book was coming out.
“Either someone woke up and smelled the roses or it was retaliatory,” he said.
But Defense Department officials maintain that Shaffer didn’t follow appropriate review procedures before the book went to press, and the Defense Department only found out after the manuscript was printed.
“That manuscript did not undergo a prepublication information security review as required by DoD regulation,” said Col. Dave Lapin, a Pentagon spokesman. Zaid says “there was an apparent disconnect” as to who possessed the authority to clear the book. Zaid and Lapin say both sides have worked closely and cooperatively with the publisher on a redacted version of the book.

Israel rabbi calls for ‘plague’ on Mahmoud Abbas

A senior rabbi from a party within Israel’s coalition government has called for Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas to “vanish from our world”. Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, spiritual leader of Shas, spoke out as Middle East talks are poised to begin in Washington. The United States condemned the remarks as “deeply offensive”. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu distanced himself from the comments with a statement saying that his government wanted peace with the Palestinians. The attack on Mr Abbas, delivered in the rabbi’s weekly sermon, also prompted chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat to condemn the remarks as “an incitement to genocide”. Mr Erakat urged the Israeli government “to do more about peace and stop spreading hatred”, the AFP news agency reported.

Rabbi Yosef expressed the wish that “all the nasty people who hate Israel, like Abu Mazen (Abbas), vanish from our world”.  He went on to say: “May God strike them down with the plague along with all the nasty Palestinians who persecute Israel.” The remarks come as Mr Netanyahu is due in Washington this week for direct peace talks with Mr Abbas. US President Barack Obama hopes to bring the leaders together on Thursday for the first face-to-face discussions since December 2008, when the Palestinians broke off negotiations over Israel’s offensive against the Gaza Strip. The US response to Rabbi Yosef, a founder of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, was swift. In a statement, US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley said: “We regret and condemn the inflammatory statements by Rabbi Ovadia Yosef.

Mr Netanyahu’s office issued a statement saying that Rabbi Yosef’s comments “do not reflect the views of Benjamin Netanyahu or of his government”. The 89-year-old former chief rabbi of Israel has been at the centre of controversy before, with comments about Arabs, secular Jews, liberals, women and gays. In 2001, during a Palestinian uprising, he called for the annihilation of Arabs and said it was forbidden to be merciful to them. He later said he was referring only to “terrorists” who attacked Israelis.

Meanwhile, Mr Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, said on Sunday that Israel’s policy of settlement-building could undermine the new round of peace talks. “Israel will be held accountable for the failure of the talks if settlement construction should continue,” Mr Abbas said in a speech delivered in Jordan. “The negotiations need to bring about serious action that will be able to bring liberation from the occupation and independence. ” Mr Abbas said Palestinians understood Israel’s need for security, but said that need should not be an “excuse to expand settlements and steal land”. In the statement responding to Rabbi Yosef’s remarks, Mr Netanyahu’s office said Israel intended to negotiate in good faith in Washington.

“Israel plans to take part in peace negotiations out of a desire to advance toward a peace agreement with the Palestinians that will end the conflict and ensure peace, security and good neighbourly relations between the two peoples,” the statement said.

Analysts say expectations for the latest round of talks are low, with the settlement issue just one of a number of area of difference.