Stop and search powers illegal, European court rules

The ability of UK police to use “arbitrary” counter-terror stop and search powers against peace protesters and photographers lay in tatters today after a landmark ruling by the European court of human rights.  The Strasbourg court ruled it was unlawful for police to use the powers, under section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, to stop and search people without needing any grounds for suspicion.

The widely-drawn ruling said that not only the use of the counter-terror powers, but also the way they were authorised, were “neither sufficiently circumscribed, nor subject to adequate legal safeguards against abuse”.  The use of these powers has grown fourfold, from 33,177 times in 2004 to more than 117,200 in 2008.  The Metropolitan police have used them most, but 11 other forces in England and Wales also make routine use of them.  A political furore ensued when it was disclosed that the whole of Greater London had been secretly designated for stop and search without suspicion since 2001.

Police did not even have to have grounds for suspecting such articles were present. The judges said that, because of this, there was a “clear risk of arbitrariness in granting such broad discretion” to a police officer.  Their concerns were compounded by the fact that black and Asian people were four times more likely to be stopped under section 44 and there was a risk that the power could be misused against demonstrators.  “The absence of any obligation on the part of the officer to show a reasonable suspicion made it almost impossible to prove that the power had been improperly exercised,” the judges said in describing the lack of judicial checks. As such, section 44 was not in “accordance with the law” and amounted to a violation of article eight – the right to respect for private and family life.  Quinton told the Guardian she was delighted with the judgment, saying: “There has to be a balance between private life and security. 
“The court has shown that section 44 is an invasion of people’s right to liberty and privacy. Hopefully the government will have to put a fairer law in place to protect us.”  Gillan hailed the ruling as “fantastic news after a long struggle” and added: “I look to the government for a strong response.” Corinna Ferguson, the legal officer for Liberty and acting for the two, said: “Liberty has consistently warned the government about the dangers of stop and search without suspicion and actively campaigned for the tightening up of the infamous section 44 power.  “The public, police and court of human rights all share our concerns for privacy, protest, race equality and community solidarity that come with this sloppy law.  “In the coming weeks parliamentarians must finally sort out this mess.” The shadow home secretary, Chris Grayling, said: “We have long said that anti-terror laws should not be used as a way of conducting normal day-to-day policing.  “The government needs to make sure that the police have the appropriate powers to deal with crime and antisocial behaviour.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s