Category Archives: Main

Israeli Force Prevents Palestinian Ambulances and Sick Women Going Hospital

Hated checkpoints top list of Palestinian targets

By Phil Reeves in Jerusalem @ Friday, 22 February 2002

Palestinians say that last month, a Palestinian man, Nasar Salim Rantisi, was shot in the leg and bled to death at the checkpoint, near Ramallah, when soldiers denied him medical care. Jihad Yaghi, 23, said this week the soldiers at Ein Ariq tried to force him to crouch and creep beneath a waist-high wire, stretched across the road before allowing him to pass. “They humiliate us,” he said. “I am very happy about the attack.”

Israeli army checkpoints, universally loathed by the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza as the cause of daily humiliation and economic misery, are at the top of the target list of Palestinian armed groups.

Two days after guerrillas delivered a shattering setback to the Israeli army by killing six soldiers at a West Bank checkpoint, another gunman struck yesterday, serving notice once again that the militias are concentrating attacks on Israel’s presence inside the occupied territories. The gunman wounded two soldiers at a checkpoint near Tulkarm and was shot dead, the Israeli army said. A second Palestinian guerrilla escaped in a car.

Israeli doctors’ group wins ‘alternative’ Nobel prize

An Israeli doctors’ group has been named as one of the four winners of this year’s Right Livelihood award – dubbed the alternative Nobel prize.  Physicians for Human Rights Israel was recognised for operating mobile clinics in occupied Palestinian territories and campaigning for patients’ rights.  The Rights Livelihood awards honour the power of grassroots change, the Sweden-based foundation said in a statement. Four recipients will share the 200,000 euro (£172,000; $273,000) prize.  The award was founded in 1980 by Swedish-German philanthropist Jakob von Uexkull to recognise work he felt was being ignored by the Nobel Foundation.  Other winners of the 2010 awards include Nigerian and Brazilian environmentalists, as well as Nepalese community activists.

Campaigning doctors

The prize will be presented to the four recipients in a ceremony at the Swedish parliament on 6 December, four days before the Nobel Prizes are handed out.  Physicians for Human Rights Israel (PHRI) was included for its “indomitable spirit” in working for the right to health for all people in Israel and the Palestinian territories, the Right Livelihood foundation said in a statement. The Tel Aviv-based group was founded in 1988 at the start of the intifada by Dr Ruchama Marton and Israeli and Palestinian physicians.  It provides healthcare to impoverished Palestinians and migrant workers, and lobbies against what it sees as repressive policies of the Israeli government.  In a statement, Dr Marton said that the award strengthens the group’s “ongoing struggle against all sources of oppression”. As a result of the blockade of Gaza, hospital facilities are extremely poor, medicines are scarce and dozens of people die each year waiting for permission to be treated in Israel, the UN has said.  Although Israel and Egypt have eased the blockade of the Gaza Strip, the movement of Palestinians is still severely restricted. Israel says the restrictions are necessary to pressure militants to stop firing rockets from the Hamas-run territory.

Pakistan halts NATO supplies after border attack

By Zeeshan Haider, ISLAMABAD | Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:53pm BST
(Reuters) – Pakistani authorities blocked a vital supply route for NATO troops fighting in Afghanistan on Thursday after the killing of three soldiers in two NATO cross-border incursions, officials said. Trucks and fuel tankers for foreign forces in Afghanistan were stopped at the Torkham border post in the Khyber tribal region near the city of Peshawar, hours after the raid.  “Yes, the NATO supplies have been stopped. It has been done locally,” a senior security official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

Aircraft from the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) initially crossed the border in the Kurram region briefly while targeting suspected insurgents who were firing on a coalition base from a position inside Afghanistan, an ISAF statement said.  They were then fired on by people in Pakistan, and crossed the border again to target that group.  “Operating in self-defence, the ISAF aircraft entered into Pakistani airspace, killing several armed individuals,” the statement said. The statement did not say if ISAF thought those killed were border guards and when asked for clarification, an ISAF spokeswoman said both sides still were investigating the incident. “This is the third incident of its kind during the past week,” the Pakistani military said in a statement. Three soldiers were wounded, it said.  Pentagon spokesman Colonel David Lapan declined to elaborate on the details of the incident but said a Pakistani statement said “their forces used rifle fire at the helicopters as a warning.”  “You fire at helicopter in a combat zone, they usually take that as hostile and return fire,” he said.

CRUCIAL ALLY

Pakistan is a crucial ally for the United States in its efforts to stabilise Afghanistan, but analysts say border incursions and disruptions in NATO supplies underline growing tensions in the relationship.
About half of all cargo for NATO forces in Afghanistan travels through Pakistan, most of it via two main border crossings: Chaman and Torkham, the Pentagon said.

Another third flows into Afghanistan through the northern distribution network across Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Sensitive gear like ammunition, weapons and critical equipment is flown in, the Pentagon said.Lapan said the Torkham border crossing closure had had “no immediate impact” on NATO resupply but its possible effect would depend on how long it remained shut. He said NATO has a variety of supply routes into Afghanistan, including others in Pakistan that remained open.  “We are in discussions with the Pakistani government and hope that we can resolve the issue,” Lapan said.  The border row occurred as CIA chief Leon Panetta began a previously scheduled visit to Pakistan for talks with top military and political figures.  Panetta met President Asif Ali Zardari, Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani, army chief General Ashfaq Kayani and the head of the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency, Lieutenant General Ahmed Shuja Pasha.

“PROFOUND CONCERN”

Gilani expressed “profound concern” over increasing drone strikes and violations of Pakistan’s airspace by NATO forces, he said in a statement. Citing reports by Western security officials about foiling a militant plot to stage coordinated attacks in Europe, Gilani pledged Pakistan’s help to thwart such plans if given “credible information in advance.”
Panetta welcomed Pakistan’s help in the fight against militants and said the U.S. government would look into its ally’s complaints about border violations.  A senior intelligence official said border incursions into Pakistan were a “red line” and could lead to a “total snapping of relations.”  Neither country could afford that, the official said, so it would be a disaster if further incursions took place.

“But we’ll live with that or we’ll die with that,” he said. “We’re in a state of war. We’ve lost more than 30,000 people since 2001. What more can we lose? Another 100,000? These incursions are not something we can tolerate.”  Pakistan has said it would consider “response options” if NATO forces continued to violate its sovereignty.  Washington has stepped up missile strikes by unmanned drone planes in Pakistan’s northwest, carrying out 21 in September, the highest for a month since it began such attacks in 2008. Also Thursday, a video purporting to show Pakistani troops in the northwestern Swat region summarily executing a group of bound and blindfolded young men appeared on the Internet.  The military is investigating, the intelligence official said, although he believed it was likely a forgery by the Pakistani Taliban, distributed as propaganda.  (Additional reporting by Chris Allbritton, Javed Hussain and Kamran Haider; Editing by Ron Popeski, Philip Barbara and Bill Trott.

Israeli forces ‘Tasered’ activist on Gaza aid boat

29 September 2010 Last updated at 21:22

Jewish activists who sought to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza say they were treated harshly when Israeli forces seized their vessel.  Yonatan Shapira, an Israeli air force pilot turned peace activist, said he was shocked with a Taser gun while passively resisting arrest.  And a British journalist said he was “ambushed” and “almost strip-searched” by commandos on board the vessel.  Israel’s military had said the vessel was seized peacefully on Tuesday.  It declined to comment on the activists’ accounts.  Earlier this year, Israeli commandos killed nine people in clashes on board a Turkish ship trying to reach Gaza.  Israel says its blockade is designed to prevent weapons being smuggled to the militant Hamas movement which runs the territory.

Harsh treatment

Yonatan Shapira, a member of left-wing group Combatants for Peace, said he was treated “brutally” by Israeli soldiers when the ship was intercepted some 20 miles (30km) off the coast of Gaza on Tuesday.  “After they boarded, I was standing with my hands around Reuven Moskowitz, the 82-year-old holocaust survivor,” he told BBC News. “We were trying to protect each other and singing: ‘We shall overcome.’  “The Israeli navy captain came closer and pulled out his Taser gun and said: ‘If you don’t let go… it will hurt.’  “We continued to hug and he shot me twice on my right shoulder. It was painful, but not as bad as the third shot.

“He moved the life vest I had on, so he could reach closer to my heart and shot me, which made me lose control of my body. It felt like an epileptic attack or something.  At that point I couldn’t hold anything and they grabbed me brutally to the boat.”

British photo-journalist Vish Vishvanath confirmed that Mr Shapira had been hit by the stun gun.  After his deportation to London, Mr Vishvanath said he had been “almost strip-searched” by Israeli special forces, who confiscated all his equipment. 

“About three commandos ambushed me and took all my camera gear. They confiscated my cell phone because it had a camera on it,” he told the Press Association.

He said the activists put up “a lot of resistance”, but that no violence was used.

Activists freed

The Irene, dubbed the Jewish Boat for Peace, was carrying what the activists called a symbolic amount of medicine, a water purifying kit and toys.  The Israeli army diverted the boat to the port of Ashdod and said the gifts would be screened and transferred overland to Gaza.  All five Israeli activists were questioned and released without charge. Three of the four foreign nationals were deported late on Tuesday. The fourth, a German nurse, would be deported in the next few days, organisers said.  Israel and neighbouring Egypt shut down Gaza’s border crossings when an Israeli soldier was captured in June 2006, and tightened the blockade further when the Islamist Hamas movement gained control of Gaza a year later.

Israel began allowing consumer goods into Gaza after its May raid on a Turkish aid ship sparked international outrage. Nine activists were killed when Israeli commandos intercepted the ship in international waters.  But it still blocks all exports from the territory, imposes a complete naval blockade, and severely restricts the movement of people.  Israel says the naval blockade is required to stop arms being smuggled to Hamas, but critics and humanitarian groups say this amounts to collective punishment of the territory’s 1.5 million people.

How I know Blair faked Iran map

By CRAIG MURRAY, Former Ambassador to Uzbekistan and Head of the Foreign Office’s Maritime Section – Last updated at 11:44 01 April 2007

Like most senior Royal Navy officers, Commodore Nick Lambert has great reserves of professional expertise and common sense. The Coalition task force commander was aboard HMS Cornwall when 15 Royal Navy personnel serving on the frigate were seized at gunpoint by Iranian forces on March 23.

A few hours after the 15 were seized, Cdre Lambert said: ‘There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that they were in Iraqi territorial waters. Equally, the Iranians may well claim that they were in their territorial waters. The extent and definition of territorial waters in this part of the world is very complicated.’ And his predecessor in command of the task force, Commodore Peter Lockwood of the Royal Australian Navy, said last October: ‘No maritime border has been agreed upon by the countries.’  Both officers told the truth. It is the burial of this truth by No 10 spin doctors, and Tony Blair’s remark that he is ‘utterly certain’ the incident took place within Iraqi territorial limits, that has escalated this from an incident to a crisis. Blair is being fatuous.  How can you be certain which side of a boundary you are when that boundary has never been drawn?  I am best known as the former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, but from 1989 to 1992 I headed the Foreign Office’s maritime section. This included responsibility for territorial sea claims and for negotiating our own maritime boundaries. The expertise of the Royal Navy was invaluable.

For eight months I also worked with Royal Naval and Defence Intelligence Service personnel in the Embargo Surveillance Centre, a secret unit operating 24 hours a day from an underground command centre in Central London to prevent Iraqi attempts at weapons procurement.  We analysed information from intelligence and other sources, and could instruct Royal Naval craft in the Gulf to board and inspect individual ships. I was responsible for getting the political clearance for operations just like the one now in question, in this exact location. So I know what I’m talking about.  There is no agreed boundary in the Northern Gulf, either between Iran and Iraq or between Iraq and Kuwait. The Iran-Iraq border has been agreed inside the Shatt al-Arab waterway, because there it is also the land border. But that agreement does not extend beyond the low tide line of the coast. Even that very limited agreement is arguably no longer in force. Since it was reached in 1975, a war has been fought over it, and ten-year reviews – necessary because waters and sandbanks in this region move about dramatically – have never been carried out.  But what about the map the Ministry of Defence produced on Tuesday, with territorial boundaries set out by a clear red line, and the co-ordinates of the incident marked in relation to it?  I have news for you. Those boundaries are fake. They were drawn up by the MoD. They are not agreed or recognised by any international authority.  To put it at its most charitable, they are a potential boundary. It is accepted practice, where no boundary exists, to work by a rule-of-thumb idea of where a boundary, based on a median line between the two coasts, might be.

But to elevate that to a hard and fast boundary, and then base a major international incident on being a few hundred yards one side or the other, is out of order.  Negotiating a maritime boundary is horribly complicated. To set a median line you agree a series of triangulation points on both coastlines and do a geometric triangulation exercise to find a line running out from the coast.  Of course, both sides will argue about which triangulation points on the coast to use. You are allowed, for example, to draw a line across a bay entrance and use that as the coast, but there is plenty of room for the other side to argue over where that line is drawn. That is only the start. For territorial seas you start at the low tide mark and uninhabited rocks and sandbanks count.  There is huge room for argument – ownership of a useless sandbank is not necessarily a settled thing. Then it really gets complex. What if the sandbank appears only at low tide or moves? In this area of the Gulf, sands shift endlessly.  It is, in short, impossible to say where a real, negotiated or adjudicated Iran-Iraq boundary might eventually lie. It is also why the instinct of both the Foreign Office and MoD was to play this quietly and negotiate our people back. But the No10 spin doctors stepped in, seeing a propaganda opportunity to portray Blair as fighting evil Iranians.  Navy and Foreign Office experts were horrified at the notion of publishing that map. In doing so we entrenched Blair’s ridiculous boast that our 15 Navy personnel were definitely in Iraqi territorial seas, and claimed the right to dictate Iran’s boundary.  It’s not surprising Iraq backed British claims – the map is favourable to them. But it makes compromise on the captives very difficult.

Of course, the Iranians equally cannot say unilaterally that these are their territorial waters, and act as if they owned them.  In disputed waters it behoves everyone to act with caution and respect. Plainly the Iranians are not doing that.  None of this vindicates Iran’s aggressive behaviour in holding the captives or the so-called confessions.  For Iran to detain the British sailors in these circumstances was  rovocative and bellicose.  To hold them for a few hours could have been taken as a legitimate, if over forceful way, of indicating their claim to the disputed waters in which the British personnel boarded a neutral vessel. But Iranian behaviour in the past few days has tipped over into the plain illegal and indefensible. However I have no doubt Blair is delighted at last to have a Middle East issue with popular support before May’s elections.  Yes, Iran has a bad government that is behaving stupidly. But perhaps it is not alone. Both sides have to climb down. We have to state that no agreed border exists and that we had no intention of straying into Iranian waters.  The Iranian government should let our people go immediately. That is the way out of this mess for both sides.

Flottille pour Gaza : une mission d’enquête accuse Israël de violence inutile

Logo du Centre d'actualités de l'ONU

September 27, 2010 – The Israeli military expressed a “pointless violence” when they intercepted a flotilla going in Gaza May 31, said Monday in Geneva Judge Karl Hudson-Phillips, head of the International Mission of independent establishing the facts established by the Council on Human Rights. Nine civilians died and several others were injured in the incident against a flotilla of ships that went to Turkey to bring aid to the population of Gaza, which is blockaded by Israel since 2007. The mission, which is different from the Panel of Eminent Persons set up in early August by the UN Secretary-General to consider the same incident, said the Israeli military behavior towards passenger fleet was “disproportionate and excessive,” said J. Hudson-Phillips to the Board of Human Rights in which he presented the 56-page report prepared by the Mission.

The report, which was released last week estimated that the interception on the high Mavi Marmara Sea, a ship belonging to the fleet, was “clearly illegal.” The three members of the mission believe that there is enough evidence to bring criminal prosecutions. They regret that the Israeli government has refused to cooperate with the mission. According to Judge Hudson-Phillips, no weapons have been seized on ships in the fleet with the exception of a few slingshots. When it appeared that Israeli forces were planning to board the Mavi Marmara, a very small group of passengers were armed with sticks and iron railings ripped from the ship, “he said. There is no evidence that shots were fired in the direction of Mavi Marmara ships carrying Israeli military said the judge.

In contrast, “the Israeli military fired live ammunition against the passengers of Mavi Marmara, killing nine of them and wounding over 50 others, six of the deceased were victims of summary executions, two were shot after have been seriously injured and then they could not defend itself, “said Judge Hudson-Phillips. The Mission Council of Human Rights has also found that Israeli forces, after seizing control of the Mavi Marmara handcuffed almost all the passengers and made to kneel for hours. When they have landed at the port of Ashdod, they tried to get them to sign confessions that they had entered Israel illegally. Those who refused to sign or give their fingerprints have been beaten. The mission, headed by Justice K. Hudson-Phillips, a former judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, interviewed over 100 witnesses in Geneva, London, Istanbul and Amman. The Mission also has two other members: Desmond de Silva, a former prosecutor at the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and Shanthi Dairiam, former member of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.

Translated with : http://translate.google.com/

Pakistan protests NATO airstrikes on its territory

(AP) – 24 minutes ago

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan has criticized a pair of NATO airstrikes on its territory that killed over 50 militants, saying they were a violation of its sovereignty. U.S. officials have said they have an agreement that allows aircraft to cross a few miles (kilometers) into Pakistani airspace if they are in hot pursuit of a target. But Pakistan denied Monday such an agreement exists. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a press release Monday that the mandate of foreign troops in Afghanistan ends at the Afghan border. Pakistan said that unless corrective measures are implemented, it will have to “consider response options.” The airstrikes occurred Saturday in Pakistan’s North Waziristan tribal area after militants attacked a small Afghan security post near the border. ISLAMABAD (AP) — NATO helicopters based in Afghanistan carried out at least two airstrikes in Pakistan that killed more than 50 militants after the insurgents attacked a small Afghan security outpost near the border, spokesmen said Monday.  NATO justified the strikes based on “the right of self-defense.” Pakistan is sensitive about attacks on its territory, but U.S. officials have said they have an agreement that allows aircraft to cross a few miles into Pakistani airspace if they are in hot pursuit of a target.

The first strike took place Saturday after insurgents based in Pakistan attacked an Afghan outpost in Khost province, which is located right across the border from Pakistan’s North Waziristan tribal area, said U.S. Capt. Ryan Donald, a spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. “The ISAF helicopters did cross into Pakistan territory to engage the insurgents,” said Donald. “ISAF maintains the right to self-defense, and that’s why they crossed the Pakistan border.” The strike killed 49 militants, said U.S. Maj. Michael Johnson, another ISAF spokesman. The second attack occurred when helicopters returned to the border area and were attacked by insurgents based in Pakistan, said Donald. “The helicopters returned to the scene and they received direct small arms fire and, once again operating in self-defense, they engaged the insurgents,” said Donald.  The strike killed at least four militants, said Johnson.  

The tribal area where the strikes took place is largely controlled by militants who regularly carry out attacks against NATO troops in Afghanistan. The U.S. rarely uses manned aircraft to carry out strikes in North Waziristan and instead relies on drone attacks that American officials refuse to acknowledge publicly. Pakistani intelligence officials said two NATO helicopters carried out a third strike inside Pakistani territory on Monday morning, killing five militants and wounding nine others. The strike occurred in the village of Mata Sanger in the Kurram tribal area, which is directly across the border from the Afghan provinces of Paktia and Nangarhar, said the officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.  Donald, the NATO spokesman, said officials were still investigating and could not confirm or deny reports of the attack in Kurram.The Pakistani military could not be reached to comment on the NATO attacks.

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

Pakistan anger at Nato-led cross-border raids

27 September 2010 Last updated at 17:54

John Sweeney revisits the Church of Scientology

In 2007, while investigating the Church of Scientology for Panorama, reporter John Sweeney had a dramatic on-camera confrontation with a church spokesman named Tommy Davis. The church was accusing the reporter of bias and it attempted to stop the documentary from being broadcast – a campaign backed by Scientology A-lister John Travolta. Sweeney has returned to investigate the church again. I never meant to shout.  Strangers had been on my tail. Scientologist Tommy Davis and his colleague Mike Rinder – my handlers – had been on my case, day in and day out. They had taken me to an exhibit called ‘Psychiatry: Industry of Death’ on Hollywood Boulevard, where a Scientologist told me psychiatrists set up the Holocaust. I feared I was being brain-washed. 

And then I lost it – big time.  The Church of Scientology put out my impression of an exploding tomato onto the internet which millions had a laugh at courtesy of YouTube.  It was no way for me to behave. I apologised then and I apologise now.  Shortly after that programme, Scientology & Me, aired in 2007, I received a tip-off that Mike Rinder had left the church.  Three years on and my old adversary came to me to shed some light on what had been going on behind the scenes in the days leading up to my infamous meltdown and screaming session in Los Angeles.  Now an independent Scientologist, Mike is critical of the church and of its leader David Miscavige, who was actor Tom Cruise’s best man at his wedding to Katie Holmes.  Mike, 55, wanted to meet and talk about his life in the church, which he was a part of from the age of six.

He began by telling me about the moment when he decided to get out: “I knew as I was walking out – that was the last time I would ever talk to my wife, my children, the rest of my family. I couldn’t take it anymore. When I left I felt I had been freed.”  Mike was subjected to what the church calls disconnection. His wife, daughter, son, brother and mother have cut him out of their lives.  Mike was one of a number of people we met who effectively grew up in the church and have since left.  Those who speak out say they can be deemed by the church to be enemies and subjected to disconnection – when all ties to family and friends are severed.

The church acknowledges some Scientologists choose to sever communications with family members who leave. The church says it is a fundamental human right to cease communication with someone. It adds disconnection is used against expelled members and those who attack the church.  During our investigation in 2007, black SUVs with tinted windows appeared to be following our team as we carried out interviews. A mystery man who we suspected was from the church also appeared to be keeping tabs on us at breakfast in our LA hotel each morning.

At the time, I put my suspicions of being under surveillance to Tommy Davis. He responded: “I don’t know what you’re talking about. It seems to me you’re getting a bit paranoid.”  Mike Rinder has since given me a different answer.  “Was I being paranoid?” I asked him when we met again.  “No, you were being followed. No doubt whatsoever,” he told me.  Mike said he should know as it was he and Tommy Davis who were doing some of the covert surveillance.  Mike said he and Tommy were reporting back on our movements to David Miscavige’s office every few minutes or so.  Through its UK lawyers, the firm Carter-Ruck, the church deny spying on us and reject Mike Rinder’s version of events dating back to 2007.

The church said it is a religion and is recognised as such in America for tax purposes. It denies emphatically that it is a cult and has maintained that I am biased.  Many ex-Scientologists disagree with the celebrities who defend the church.  Amy Scobee, now in her mid-40s, is a former member who said she believes it is “a dangerous cult”. She was a member from the age of 14, much of her time in the church was spent as part of what is known as the Sea Org – the highly-disciplined wing that effectively runs the church’s day to day operations.  When Ms Scobee left and began to criticise David Miscavige and the church intimate details of her sex life before she was married leaked to the St Petersburg Times in Florida newspaper.  

The church admits sending the newspaper material about Ms Scobee’s sex life, but said it was acceptable because the information was contained in an affidavit signed by her. They say it was not confidential. Ms Scobee said she had disclosed those details but she believed they would remain confidential.  During our time in America for the latest Panorama, we were once again followed by people filming us, this time more openly than before. When we approached the people with cameras to ask them who they were with and what they were doing, they refused to answer our questions.  That is why I was somewhat grateful to Scientology’s UK lawyers at Carter-Ruck when they sent the BBC photographs of me hugging Amy Scobee at the end of a long and at times harrowing series of interviews about her experiences.

The photographs were meant to demonstrate to my bosses at the BBC, once again, that I must be biased against the church as I was overly familiar with its critics.  This was, oddly enough, welcome proof that the people who had been following and filming us in the States were indeed working for the Church of Scientology. As Mike Rinder had said, I was not being paranoid – I was being followed.came to me to shed some light on what had been going on behind the scenes in the days leading up to my infamous meltdown and screaming session in Los Angeles.  Now an independent Scientologist, Mike is critical of the church and of its leader David Miscavige, who was actor Tom Cruise’s best man at his wedding to Katie Holmes.  Mike, 55, wanted to meet and talk about his life in the church, which he was a part of from the age of six.

He began by telling me about the moment when he decided to get out: “I knew as I was walking out – that was the last time I would ever talk to my wife, my children, the rest of my family. I couldn’t take it anymore. When I left I felt I had been freed.”  Mike was subjected to what the church calls disconnection. His wife, daughter, son, brother and mother have cut him out of their lives.  Mike was one of a number of people we met who effectively grew up in the church and have since left.  Those who speak out say they can be deemed by the church to be enemies and subjected to disconnection – when all ties to family and friends are severed.

Khaled Meshaal Interview: Hamas Chief Weighs In on Eve of Peace Talks

Palestinian resistance group Hamas has beaten some unusual odds to survive today: Israel’s unlawful siege of Gaza has crippled the coastal strip’s economy and left Hamas scrambling to govern a restless population living under increasingly desperate conditions. Its officials and members are targeted by Israel and the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority (PA) for detention, torture and extrajudicial killings. Pro-US Arab leaders undermine it at every turn, partly to satisfy American demands, partly because they fear the widespread popularity of any moderate Islamist resistance group among their own populations.

MI6 spook did NOT die alone: Police certain he was padlocked in bag by someone else

The MI6 spy whose naked body was found in a sports bag in his bath could not have died alone, police believe.  They are now certain he was padlocked into the large holdall by someone else.  Gareth Williams, 31, who was working on secondment for MI6, was alive when he got into – or was forced into – the bag and died from suffocation.  There were no injuries on his body to suggest a struggle and police have still not ruled out the possibility that his death was the culmination of a bizarre sex game that went wrong.

But in another mysterious twist, the Mail can reveal that the outer door to Mr Williams’s flat in Pimlico, Central London, had apparently been locked from the outside when police arrived on the scene.  Detectives have now intensified their search for a Mediterranean couple known to have been with Mr Williams in the weeks before his death. They are understood to have had a set of keys to the flat.  The disclosures come after a month of frenzied speculation about what happened in the flat last month, including theories that Mr Williams committed suicide alone.  But as the head of MI6 attended Mr Williams’s funeral near his family home in North Wales yesterday, the Daily Mail can reveal that this line of inquiry has been discounted.

We can also reveal that there is no evidence to support claims that Mr Williams was a cross-dresser, that bondage equipment was found at his home, that a laptop was missing from the flat, or that he had reported to spy bosses that he was being followed.Nor, as was claimed in one report, was any suspicious liquid found next to his body in the sports bag.  Police have also dismissed allegations of irregularities in his finances and there is no evidence that Mr Williams had committed any criminal acts.